There’s still a little bit more trading left in 2018, but between now and the closing bell, we wouldn’t expect much of a major shift in the final performance numbers for the major market sectors.  The chart below shows the annual percentage change of the 11 S&P sectors by year in terms of price returns.  Additionally, the shading for each sector represents how that sector performed relative to other sectors for that particular year.  For example, in 2018 Energy was the worst performing sector with a decline of 20.9%, so it is shaded red, while Health Care, with a gain of 4.6%, has been the best performing sector, so it is shaded in green.  The gap in performance between the best and worst performing sectors this year was 25.5 percentage points.  While that may sound like a wide disparity between sectors, it is actually the narrowest performance gap between the best and worst performing sectors of any other year in the table!  Last year, which was generally considered a year where everything traded higher, the performance gap was much wider at 42.9 percentage points as Technology rallied 36.9% while Telecom was down 6%.

Looking at recent trends in performance, one sector that stands out for its weakness is Energy.  Over the last five years, the sector has been down for the year four times and been the worst performing sector in three of those years (2014, 2015, and 2018) and the second worst performing sector in the other (2017).  While it was the best performing sector in the one year it was up (2016), since the end of 2013, it has been a sector where money goes to burn.  To put the recent losses for the sector in perspective, over a period where the S&P 500 is up 31%, the Energy sector is down over 35%.  Put another way, had you invested $100 in SPY at the end of 2013 ($131.15) you would now have more than twice the amount of money you would have if you had invested in XLE ($64.73).  While the renaissance in US energy production has been great for the US economy, the companies actually involved in getting the stuff out of the ground have probably benefited the least.

What sector would have been the friendliest over that same time-span?  That would be tech as $100 invested in XLK (the Technology sector ETF) would be worth close to $200 ($197.17) today.  Times haven’t always been good for tech, though.  The dark ages for the sector were from 2000 through 2002 when it lost 25% or more for three straight years.  That’s a streak that no other sector can lay claim to, and the only sector that saw even back to back declines of 25%+ was Utilities.  Yes, you read that right, the sector that is universally thought to be the most defensive sector in the market once saw a two-year stretch where it declined over 50%!

Welcome to Bespoke Brunch Reads — a linkfest of the favorite things we read over the past week. The links are mostly market related, but there are some other interesting subjects covered as well. We hope you enjoy the food for thought as a supplement to the research we provide you during the week.

While you’re here, join Bespoke Premium for 3 months for just $95 with our 2019 Annual Outlook special offer.

Genetics

Chinese Gene-Editing Experiment Loses Track of Patients, Alarming Technology’s Inventors by Preetika Rana and Wenxin Fan (WSJ)

Trials of a cutting edge gene editing technology in China have run at a break-neck pace, but the speed comes with consequences: losing touch with patients, side-effects, and other sloppy methodology that puts patients at risk. [Link; paywall]

Five Amazing Things We Learned About History From Ancient DNA In 2018 by Jennifer Raff (Forbes)

A run-down of the insights DNA offers into ancient populations and therefore history that dates back to a time we can’t usually see. [Link; auto-playing video]

Infrastructure

Swamped With Inventory, U.S. Companies Turn to ‘Mobile Storage’ by Erica E. Phillips (WSJ)

With trade flows disrupted and inventories overflowing from bottlenecks in specific ports and logistical hubs, companies are turning their transportation assets into mobile mini-warehouses. [Link; paywall]

Idaho lab protects US infrastructure from cyber attacks by Keith Ridler (AP)

A tour of the Idaho National Laboratory, a key research facility is running at a break-neck pace as funding for and experience with cybersecurity rushes to keep up with the rapid evolution of the US security infrastructure. [Link]

Wealth of the Nation

The Long Run Effects of De Jure Discrimination in the Credit Market: How Redlining Increased Crime by John Anders (Working Paper)

This draft paper analyzes the long-run effects of racist housing policies implemented during the New Deal, making a causal link between the practice of redlining and crime both within and across cities. [Link; 64 page PDF]

‘I see no way out’: Living paycheck to paycheck is disturbingly common by Danielle Paguette (Philly Inquirer/WaPo)

Four out of ten Americans reported they couldn’t fund a $400 emergency expense in 2017, a number consistent with Bespoke’s surveys which indicate roughly 40% of the country considers itself living “paycheck to paycheck”. [Link]

Messing With The Midwest

The Der Spiegel journalist who messed with the wrong small town by Michele Anderson and Jake Krohn (Spectator)

A German reporter from Der Spiegel journeyed to Minnesota to examine the soul of America, but his gross fabrications ended up getting him fired after a broader series of invented stories were revealed. This response from two residents is worthwhile. [Link]

Streaming

Netflix says a third of its global subscriber base watched ‘Bird Box’ in the original film’s first week by Sara Salinas (CNBC)

While comparing the success of a film on Netflix to those released through traditional venues, it’s clear that Bird Box was extremely popular, with more than 45 million views likely in the first week of its availability. [Link]

Fast Food

Should McDonald’s Serve Burgers In The Morning? by Jonathan Maze (Restaurant Business)

An analysis of the reasons that the Golden Arches won’t be offering you a Breakfast Big Mac any time soon, no matter how compelling demands might be on social media. [Link]

Charts

The 45 Best — And Weirdest — Charts We Made In 2018 (538)

Some clear, some confusing, these charts are a testament to the creativity of data journalists and a fun rundown of the year that was. [Link]

The Fed

Trump Discusses Firing Fed’s Powell After Latest Rate Hike, Sources Say by Jennifer Jacobs, Saleha Mohsin, and Margaret Talev (Bloomberg Quint)

Enraged that the Federal Reserve is raising interest rates, the President has discussed taking out his anger on the Fed Chair, a move for which he has dubious legal grounds and little political mandate. [Link; soft paywall]

Read Bespoke’s most actionable market research by joining Bespoke Premium today!  Get started here.

Have a happy New Year!

Bespoke co-founder Paul Hickey appeared on CNBC’s Power Lunch today to discuss the current market and whether this week’s rally was a bottom or a bounce.  To view the segment click on the image below.

Please click the image below to view our most recent Idea Generator report.

After weak manufacturing sentiment was reported by the Kansas City and Richmond Fed surveys over the past week, our tracking of the five different manufacturing indices suggested that ISM PMI was likely to come in much weaker than the 59.3 reported in November. The Chicago PMI released this morning had a very different message. As shown, it forecasts an ISM PMI only very slightly lower MoM. Of course, the Chicago PMI has lagged other surveys in recent months, as shown in the chart below. Still, it seems clear that the impact of stock market declines on manufacturing sentiment isn’t universal. The current reading for the Chicago PMI index is actually higher than 95% of readings since 1990, and higher than all but two months from the peak of the mid-2000s cycle.